IT Financial Management (ITFM)
See what a system costs across licences, infrastructure and vendor contracts, who owns that spend, and which renewals land in the next quarter.
IT financial management
state3 Enterprise
One graph. Many lenses.
Application portfolio, risk, cost, change and service management are usually five tools holding five versions of the same organisation. In state3 Enterprise they are five views of one model. The risk you record against an application sits on the same application the cost is attached to, and the same one the change board is about to touch. The architecture is the model itself rather than a diagram kept beside it.
The capabilities
Five lenses on the same graph.
Each one answers a different kind of question. They share the same underlying model, so an answer from one is usable in another. Two audiences have their own way in: organisational context for IT operations and technology intelligence for CIOs.
Change Process Management
Before a change is approved, see what it touches: the applications, services, processes, people and risks connected to it.
change impact assessmentApplication Portfolio Management (APM)
See what an application costs, who owns it, which business capabilities it supports, what depends on it, and whether something else already does the same job.
application portfolio managementRisk Management
Attach a risk to the application, vendor, service or business activity it actually sits on. Record the owner and treatment, then see what else is exposed through those connections.
technology risk managementIT Service Management (ITSM)
Link services to the applications and infrastructure beneath them, so an incident on a server reads as the business services it affects. Where there is no separate service desk, state3 handles the requests too.
IT service managementThe AI layer
Every view above is queryable through MCP. An authorised AI client puts the question to state3, and state3 answers within the permissions that user already has.
See the MCP interface
Why one platform
Because the answers live between the silos.
Most tools hold either the business view or the technology view. The questions that actually hold up a decision sit across the join. Which business process depends on this server. What an application costs once the contract is included. Who has to sign off if it changes. Answering those means one model, not two well-integrated ones.
Two routes in
Automated feeds and ingestion-hub imports are staged and reconciled before they land. Entity-specific imports, direct edits and MCP writes are validated and written straight to the graph. How state3 stays current.
Impact assessments across 14+ entities
Trace what a change touches before committing to it, and follow the link from one impact report into the next.
Enterprise architecture views
Technology maps, infrastructure dependency diagrams, application-to-capability views, and current-versus-future-state scenarios, all drawn from the same model.
See it on your own estate.
A tailored demo runs on data shaped like yours, so you can judge it against an environment you recognise rather than a sample one.